In many ways what we routinely call the achievement gap can
be understood as a vocabulary gap. It has been almost 20 years since the famous
Hart
and Risley study pronounced the thirty million word gap. As the graph to the right shows, they found that by
age 3 children from affluent families heard 30 million more words than children
from the lowest socio-economic group. Additionally, children in higher
socio-economic groups heard more statements of encouragement, while children
from low socio-economic groups heard more words of discouragement.
The child’s greatest asset in coming to be literate is, of
course, the oral language each child brings to the school door. It is
obvious that some children arrive with the major advantage of a much larger
vocabulary; a vocabulary learned not
through dedicated study, but through lots and lots of contextualized and
supportive talk. And this advantage only grows with time. While all children
learn many new words in school, children who start with a larger receptive
vocabulary add more words more quickly because they have more word structures
in the brain (schema) to receive these new words. It is an example of what has been
called “The Matthew Effect”, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.”
Recognizing the critical nature of the first three years in
a child’s life and of the huge impact on language development that comes from
the primary caregiver of that young child, organizations like Too
Small to Fail and the Thirty
Million Words Initiative are going into homes and helping care givers learn
how to nurture the child’s early language development.
Such programs are hopeful, but once the child arrives at
school what can a teacher do to narrow the word gap? It seems obvious that if
we could narrow the vocabulary gap we would be making inroads in the
achievement gap.
One school-based answer would be to provide children with a language rich
learning environment. An environment where the teacher engages the children in
lots and lots of contextualized talk about a broad range of subjects, but also
an environment where children are talking to each other in structured play
situations. I addressed this issue of
talk in the early years of schooling here. I worry that a movement toward a
more academic orientation of pre-school and kindergarten could move teachers
away from providing the time for the kind of structured play that encourages
children to interact with each other around contextualized play. As Fiano
(2013) has said,
Teachers need to be more tolerant of student
talk in the classroom.
Consistent modeling
and multiple opportunities for practicing oral
discourse in student-led workstations will alleviate off-task
discourse in student-led workstations will alleviate off-task
behavior by students. Additionally, there
needs to be time built in for
teachers to observe the language that
students are using during
independent workstation use (p. 77).
Another,
equally important, answer is the interactive read-aloud. I have addressed the
importance of read-alouds in other posts here
and here.
In this post I would like to make a plea for the interactive read-aloud as a
way to build all children’s vocabularies. As I worry that the push for higher
standards and test driven accountability might drive out play in the
kindergarten, I also worry that these forces might drive out read-alouds from
the daily diet of the student. This would be a tragedy on many levels, not the
least of which is that the read-aloud offers a great opportunity for narrowing
the vocabulary gap.
To
learn new words children need to hear the rich language of the best children’s
literature as often as possible. Immersion in this language through read-aloud
is a good beginning, but children also need to have their word acquisition
mediated by the teacher who can contextualize and clarify new words and model
for students how the meanings of new words can be determined through the
context of the passage.
Enter
the interactive read-aloud.
An
interactive read-aloud is a systematic approach that includes the teacher doing
the following:
·
Modeling higher-level thinking
·
Gathering, confirming and revising student predictions
·
Asking thoughtful questions focused on analyzing the text
·
Prompting student recall
·
Reading one book repeatedly
·
Reading books on a related topic
·
Systematically discussing words through providing short definitions and/or
modeling identifying a word in context
Research
has shown that it takes many encounters with a word to “own” it. Reading one
book repeatedly provides an environment to encounter words over and over again.
Reading books on a related topic helps students build a vocabulary around a
particular theme or content. For example, reading aloud many books on insects
over of the period of a week will expose students to insect related words in a
context that allows them to make connections and again encounter these words
multiple times. Reading books organized around related topics builds the
content vocabulary for future study of these topics.
Simply
hearing words in a rich context is not always enough, so it is also important
that the teacher stop during the read-aloud to provide short definitions or
longer explanations of words when necessary. Taking breaks during the read-aloud to have children turn and talk to each other about words they hear will
get the students using the words and reflecting on the meanings.
So
much for the how of a read-aloud focused on vocabulary development, what books should
we read aloud? The answer is any book of high quality that uses words in a rich
and meaningful context. Research has shown that children’s listening
comprehension is about two grade levels ahead of their reading comprehension,
so interactive read-aloud provides the opportunity for reading highly literate
texts that we might not use in regular reading instruction. Aim high with your
read-alouds and scaffold the children’s comprehension and vocabulary
acquisition.
We
should also be reading a good mix of fiction and non-fiction in our read-alouds. Vocabulary development is largely a matter of building more and more
sophisticated conceptual knowledge. Reading non-fiction, as well as fiction,
helps build this conceptual knowledge.
Read-aloud is a critical part of the instructional day. We must not let it be
crowded out by someone’s idea of what 21st century instruction looks
like. If we need to justify our read-aloud time in the plan book, we should write
that we are narrowing the vocabulary gap by exposing the children to the rich
vocabulary they need for continued learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment