Chicago, Illinois is ground zero in the fight against corporate
education reform this weekend as the Network for Public Education (NPE)
held its 2nd annual conference at the Drake Hotel. It was an
exciting day filled with information, exhiliration and emotion as almost 600 passionate teachers, teacher leaders, political activists, parents
and education bloggers packed the house. For those who were unable to make it
to Chicago the event was livestreamed at schoolhouselive.org. You
can catch day two there tomorrow. Here are the highlights from the sessions I was able to
attend today.
Opening Keynote
New Jersey’s own Tanasia Brown of the Newark Student Union
showed off the skills of a veteran speaker as she got the day off to a rousing,
not to mention, chanting start. Her message: “Victory means seeing my brother
being able to attend a real public school in Newark. Tanasia was followed by
the always inspirational Jitu Brown of Chicago. Jitu urged us to stop
describing corporate education interlopers “reformers” and start calling them
what they are “colonizers.” Powerful stuff.
Defending the Early
Years
The first panel session I attended was presented by Nancy Carlsson-Paige
and Geralyn Bywater McLaughlin. The presenters and the members of the audience
together created a powerful indictment of the Common Core State Standards for
grades K-2. Carlsson-Paige, McLaughlin and their colleagues are doing great
work publicizing the developmental inappropriateness of the Common Core for
young children. Their website is certainly worth visiting frequently for
constantly updated information for those of you fighting for appropriate
learning environments for young children.
Check
out the website here. One parent in the audience summed up the discussion
by declaring, “My child is not college and career ready because he is - a
child.”
How to Effectively
Debunk Myths in an Era of Education Misinformation
Jeff Bryant of the Education Opportunity Network moderated
this panel of media communication experts Hilary Tone and Diallo Brooks. Tone
cited the recent study her group did that showed when news outlets do stories about
education, they rarely talk to educators. Brooks encouraged teachers to tell
their stories. Stories carry the messages better than facts do, because people
are not persuaded by facts. Reformers are telling a simple false story of
failing schools and bad teachers. We must combat this false narrative with our
own stories and we must keep telling them.
Lunch
Lunch, of course, is always a highlight for me, but today’s
lunch was made particularly memorable for the opportunity to listen to bloggers
Jennifer Berkshire (
Edushyster) Peter
Greene (
Curmudgucation) and
Jose Vilson (
Thejosevilson.com). I if
you haven’t sampled the witty writing of these three champions of public
education, I suggest you click on these links and get started.
Afternoon Keynote
If you have not yet read Yong Zhao’s book Who’s Afraid of
the Big, Bad Dragon, I suggest you do so right away. I discussed Zhao’s take on
the
standardized
test mania in this post. Zhao’s talk was the hands down highlight of the
day. Warm, witty, knowledgeable and incisive, Zhao had the large group roaring
with laughter and thinking hard and well about testing all at the same time.
Zhao says that the Common Core targets the wrong goals in college and career
readiness. For him, “Readiness should be ready to not live in your parents’
basement – to be a productive member of society.” My favorite line, “I should
not have to be ready for kindergarten, kindergarten should be ready for me.”
Teacher Evaluation
Begins with Valuing Teachers
I was privileged to lead a panel discussion on teacher
evaluation with National Board Certified and former teacher of the year in
Michigan, Nancy Flanagan and public education hero, former principal and
believer in the democratic process in schools, Deborah Meier. The audience for
this late afternoon session was large and engaged and many had horror stories
to tell. The take aways were many, but a few can be stated here:
·
A valid evaluation system must include the
teacher as integral to the process
·
Evaluation requires nuance, not numbers
·
VAMs and rubrics can never capture the richness
of a teaching situation
·
Instructional observers must be knowledgeable
and have the resources to do the job
·
A democratic process of peer evaluation is
effective, but difficult to manage
·
Evaluation is primarily an opportunity for
professional reflection and growth, not a gotcha’
Truly a wonderful day. Looking forward to tomorrow’s
sessions, including Diane Ravitch’s “conversation” with the AFT’s Randi
Weingarten and the NEA’s Lily Eskelsen Garcia. Fireworks anyone? Livestream if
you cannot be here.
|
A Thorn Between Two Roses Deborah Meier/Russ Walsh/Nancy Flanagan Teacher Evaluation Panel |