New research provides an old recipe for success
Scholastic, Inc. is out with a new
research report based on a survey of 1,000 children between the ages of 6
and 17. Motoko Rich reported on the research in the New York Times in an article
titled, “Study
Finds Reading to Children of All Ages Grooms Them to Read More on Their Own.”
Rich’s title tells a part of the story. The full report is good news for
teachers who need all the data they can to support good instructional practices
in literacy in the face of the attack of the Big Bad Standardized Test mania.
Here is what Scholastic found as characteristics of frequent
readers (kids who read more than 40 books a year) ages 6-11:
·
They were read aloud to 5-7 days a week before entering
kindergarten.
·
They are
currently being read to at home.
·
They want books that allow them to use their
imagination and that have characters that “look like me.”
·
They do not go online 5-7 days per week.
As Rich alludes to in the title of her article, one of the
most important findings of this research is that frequent readers are still
being read to at home even after they have begun reading on their own in
school. This is critical, of course, because so many parents stop reading to
their children once the kids start reading. This is a mistake and teachers need
to highlight this research for parents and continually campaign for parents to
continue the read aloud practice throughout elementary school and beyond.
Teachers, of course, cannot control what parents will and
will not do, but teachers can be read aloud advocates encouraging parents
through back-to-school night messages, newsletters and classroom web sites to
keep up the home-based read aloud. One overt way to do this is to allow a child
to take home from the school or classroom library a book that the child is
interested in, but that may be too difficult for that child to read
independently. The teacher could send the book home with a quick note to the parents
that the book would make a good family read aloud.
Scholastic found the following characteristics of children
who are frequent readers (read an average of 39.6 books per year) ages 12-17:
·
They read
independently during the school day.
·
They read more books after being introduced to
e-books.
·
They live in a home with 150 or more print books.
·
They know their own reading level.
·
They have parents who help them find books and
encourage reading for fun.
Here I have highlighted the important practice of having
kids 12-17 read independently in school.
This in school reading opportunity seems to be particularly important for
low-income children who reported they were more likely to read for fun in
school than at home.
Independent in-school reading with middle and high school
children is central to creating frequent readers. It is one variable that is
completely under the control of the school and the teacher. It would be inexcusable if
this effective practice were to fall by the wayside in the name of test
preparation or some other less productive use of instructional time. We need to
remember that all of our instruction in the skills and strategies of reading
are for naught if children do not choose to read on their own.
I remember Mrs. V, a wonderful eighth grade teacher I
supervised for many years. She had dedicated time in each of her classes for
independent reading. Mrs. V built up, over the years, a wonderful library of
young adult fiction from which the students could choose books that matched
their interests and abilities. Students also made trips to the school library
to broaden their choices.
As more and more pressure for test-based accountability
began to creep into her school after NCLB, Mrs. V. found her independent
reading practice under siege from some administrators. She bravely fought it
off with calm reason and clear research on the benefits of what she was doing. Her
kids kept reading independently. We all must continue to do the same.
Secretary Duncan says that annual testing of children is a “moral
imperative.” Reading aloud to children and providing time for in-school
independent reading, for me, is also a “moral imperative.” Which imperative do
you think will serve students better over time?
No comments:
Post a Comment